When the Contractor Misses the Completion Date, the Contract Determines Who Pays What
Construction schedule delay is one of the most common and most disputed issues in construction contracts. When the contractor does not achieve Substantial Completion by the contract's established date, the owner may have suffered real financial losses - rent not received, business operations delayed, carrying costs on construction financing extending beyond the planned period. Quantifying these actual damages is difficult and subject to dispute. Liquidated damages provisions address this problem by establishing in advance, at the time of contracting, a specific daily dollar amount that the contractor will owe the owner for each day of delay beyond the contract completion date. The architect's role in administering the schedule and evaluating delay claims is significant, and the ARE CE exam tests these concepts as part of the construction administration content area.
Liquidated Damages
A liquidated damages (LD) clause in a construction contract specifies a pre-agreed daily dollar amount (e.g., $2,000 per calendar day beyond the Substantial Completion date) that the contractor will pay the owner as compensation for delay. LD clauses are enforceable when: the amount represents a reasonable estimate of the actual damages the owner would suffer from delay (agreed at the time of contracting, before actual damages are known); and when actual damages are difficult to calculate with precision. LD clauses are NOT enforceable if they are found by a court to be punitive (disproportionately large relative to actual harm - a "penalty" rather than a damage estimate). The contractor typically has the LD amount withheld from their final payment; the owner does not need to prove actual damages to enforce a properly structured LD clause.
Excusable vs. Compensable Delay
Excusable delay: Delay caused by events beyond the contractor's control - owner-directed changes, unusually severe weather (beyond what the contractor reasonably could have anticipated), acts of God, strikes, material shortages caused by national emergencies. Excusable delays entitle the contractor to a time extension (extension of the contract completion date) but NOT to additional compensation. The contractor is not penalized for excusable delays but absorbs their own extended overhead costs. Compensable delay: Delay caused by the owner or the architect - slow RFI responses that delay the critical path, design errors that require redesign while work is suspended, owner-directed scope changes. Compensable delays entitle the contractor to BOTH a time extension AND additional compensation for extended overhead and other delay costs. The architect must recognize the difference between types of delay when evaluating contractor time extension requests, because the wrong determination can expose the owner to significant additional claims.
The Architect's Role
The architect evaluates contractor requests for time extensions by: reviewing the contractor's schedule showing the critical path impact of the claimed delay event; determining whether the claimed delay is excusable or compensable; confirming that the delay is not concurrent with contractor-caused delay (concurrent delay - where both owner and contractor contribute to the same period of delay - is handled differently depending on jurisdiction and contract terms). The architect issues a determination of the time extension (if any) and, for compensable delays, refers the compensation claim to the owner for negotiation as a Change Order.
Key Exam Points
- Liquidated damages: pre-agreed daily amount for delay; enforceable if reasonable estimate; not a penalty.
- Excusable delay: beyond contractor's control; time extension only; contractor absorbs own extended overhead.
- Compensable delay: owner's/architect's fault; time extension + money for contractor's extended overhead and delay costs.
- Architect's role: evaluate CPM schedule to confirm critical path impact; determine excusable vs. compensable; issue time extension determination.
- Concurrent delay: both parties contributed; complex; jurisdiction-specific treatment.
AREprep's CE construction administration content covers liquidated damages provisions, excusable and compensable delay, time extension evaluation, and the architect's role in administering schedule-related claims - giving ARE CE candidates the schedule management and claims knowledge the exam tests in construction administration scenario questions about how the architect evaluates and resolves contractor delay claims.
Study CE on AREprep
AREprep's CE flashcards and practice exams are built around the actual NCARB exam guide - so every study session targets what the exam tests.